Firstly, Reid, no need to challenge my opinion on the existence of hell. I was using it in a common expression of hatred towards an object/person, not in a literal sense.
Now, to business: Fuck Hollywood. They have done it to me again.
Tonight, we rented the movie Firewall, with Harrison Ford. Anyone who knows anything about the Internet knows that a firewall is a security appliance designed to, amongst other things, restrict incoming and outgoing traffic to and from a network. The first thing about the movie that I hated was that it had pretty much nothing to do with firewalls. The only time a firewall took the spotlight was in the first 5 minutes when Harrison's character, who shall henceforth be known as Jack, typed in some very convincing iptables (or maybe pf) rules to make changes to his bank's firewall ruleset.
And that was the last mention of any kind of firewall. I think they just chose the coolest sounding computer buzzword they could think of. "Bluetooth" and "CD-ROM" weren't thrilling enough, I guess.
But I'm getting ahead of myself. Summary: Jack Whatever is the network security manager for a big bank. Some bad guys take he and his family hostage and force Jack to steal a collective $100,000,000 from the bank's 10,000 richest customers.
On its own, completely ignoring any technical details, the movie is reasonably entertaining. As a technical person, however, I... just... can't... ignore!
The technical accuracy ended in the first 5 minutes, after the low-level tech guy stopped using Ethereal to monitor the bank's network and Jack started changing the production firewall for a bank on the fly. You just don't do that, even if you're Han fucking Solo AND Indiana fucking Jones.
The next big innacuracy is the device that Jack MacGyvered to read account information off of a computer screen and store in an iPod. He basically took some kind of PCB from a fax machine, hooked it up to a screen-reader and an iPod, and taped it to a screen in the bank security room. *Poof* Now they had account information. Yeah, right.
Next, he uses a bank security employee's cell phone to take an image of a computer screen in a secure area. This is not technically inaccurate, it is socially inaccurate. Anyone who works in some kind of secure area is most likely barred from having any kind of recording/capturing devices in that area, including a camera phone. This would be especially true at a bank.
The biggest flaw that just pissed me the hell of and sparked this post was easily the biggest plot hole I've seen in a long time.
While with his secretary in her car, he gets her to pull over somewhere in the city, not close to downtown. He takes out her shitty laptop, puts it on the roof of the car, and surfs to a website that allows people to track their pets via GPS. You see, his family, including the dog, were being driven to some strange place and he remembered that his dog's collar had a tracking device.
Ok, this seems reasonab... WAIT! How the FUCK do you have Internet?!?
First of all, you're using a shitty laptop outside. I guarantee you aren't in range of an unprotected wireless network with a strong enough signal for that site to load instantly. I also guarantee that, judging by the model of your daughter's iPod (Mini), your city does not have universal wireless Internet access. Furthermore, you're laptop is running Windows XP, which means that even if you somehow found a wireless signal, it would take you at least 3 minutes and 2 reboots before you could actually get an IP address.
Ok, how could he possibly be getting Internet? Well, perhaps the secretary has a satellite receiver in her car. NOPE. Ok, perhaps he had a PCMCIA card that plugs into a cell phone to get "dial-up" Internet. NOPE. Correct me if I'm wrong, kiddies, but a consumer laptop can't just magically get Internet from nothing. Right?? The pair kept using their magical powers of Wireless Anywhere Internet to track the dog outside the city limits while driving.
The reason this pissed me off so much was because the entire conclusion of the movie hinged on the inclusion of this big gaping plot hole. I mean, with this one detail, they managed to morph genres from Thriller to Sci-Fi.
Fuck! Gah, I'm so angry that I don't know what to say.
FUCK.
Sunday, June 18, 2006
Posted by
Johnny
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
First of all, you could have saved yourself a lot of time and aggrevation if you had just asked your wise friend Kim about the movie Firewall. Having already seen it (in theatres, mind you), I would have steered you clear away from what I also found to be an incredibly horrible, inaccurate and unbelievable movie.
Second of all, you're a geek!! And I mean that in the sweetest, nicest way possible. I also recognized the plot was a bit far-fetched, but I certainly could never have used all those techie words to explain why.
Third... and most important: I often magically get wireless internet on my shitty consumer Windows-running laptop as if from nowhere... OR... perhaps I have a PCMCIA card that plugs into a cell phone to get dial-up Internet. No one knows.
If those are the worst technical plot holes, it isn't that bad.
To me, the worst plot holes are of [i]motivation[/i]. Technical things can be explained away, but motivation can't.
That is all.
Kim, thank you. I'm well aware of my geekiness (30.17751%, or Total Geek according to http://www.innergeek.us/geek-test.html). I'm also not ashamed of it - it is directly related to my chosen profession and my geekish tendencies will earn me lots of money.
Kevin, you are also correct. I had a hard time figuring out the motivation for the robbers to use Harrison to help them steal. Couldn't they have just done it themselves? They clearly knew enough to write programs to interact with the banking system and they knew enough to gain access to and control Harrison's computer, so why couldn't they just do all the dirty work themselves and set him up?
There's no point in asking the above questions. I'm done with this movie.
Here's something extra geeky: I took your little geek test, and discovered I have 21.49901% geekiness, making me only a Geek, and not a Total Geek like yourself...
But I think I have to accept extra points for taking the test after you referenced it in a comment posted on your blog that I read religiously... If only there were blog-related questions...
I have Johnny beat! I did exaggerate a bit sometimes...like it suggested, to score better. But I beat Johnny, and he went to band camp!
30.57199%
First of all, I'm so happy you took that test Kim. You even got to add the 5 points for being a girl. They mentioned that the test was > 2 years old, so recent advances in computing such as blogger and myspace weren't accounted for. Notice how I called them advances in computing...
Kevin, if I'd lied more, I could have beat you. And Kim went to band camp too, I'll have you know!
I pwn all you guys in the geekiness sector. 46.35108% - Super Geek. Thats what music does to people...
I'd add at least another 1% for using the word "pwn".
Post a Comment