Monday, February 26, 2007

Cacti

Posted by Johnny

I'm not sure how much of this was written with serious intentions and how much is graffiti, but here is the conservapedia article on the cactus. (Conservapedia was set up to counter the apparently liberal bias inherent in Wikipedia. But what they mistook as a liberal bias is actually the use of "science" and "facts".)

The secularist view of the Cactaceae is that they are roughly two million years old, and that they have evolved exclusively in the new world. This view fails to explain, however, how it is that the Opuntia genus is native to the island of Opus, near Greece. Cacti are known for their high content of alkaloids, and have often been used in the sacramental rights of the Native Americans. Because of this, the early Catholic missionaries in the west thought the plants to be the work of Satan, and this is perhaps a preferable view to that of materialistic evolution since it is difficult to imagine how something like mescaline could have evolved by natural selection. Besides that, the psychoactive content of many cacti have inspired the writings of such ungodly men as Aldous Huxley and Albert Hoffman.

Several species of cactus are now endangered in the west due to "poaching" by collectors and invasive species. But, since Genesis suggests that man has been given dominion over all of the earth, the environmentalist concerns on this note are entirely inappropriate. It may also be that environmentalists, in addition to flauting the Word of God, are merely concerned about the effects that declining cactus populations will have on their supply of mescaline.

4 comments:

Kim said...

I'm actually terrified that this isn't a joke...

Johnny said...

You know what you should be more terrified of? The rapture, you heathen. Because when it comes, you're going straight to hell to live with the devil and his cacti.

Kim said...

Easy there...

It's anchorMAN, not anchorLADY. And that is a SCIENTIFIC FACT.

Everything that has ever been written by anyone has some sort of bias. That's why we need to use our own brains to interpret the world around us.

Johnny said...

I have 0 experience with Vista, and I intend to keep it that way until it is absolutely necessary. I don't use my Windows machines for anything other than hardcore computing, so sleekness and visual effects would be lost on me. I'm also not a fan of having to verify my questionable actions, so it's kind of a no-brainer to stick with XP.

As for conservapedia, I completely agree that it is an utter insult to actual conservatives to be associated with this garbage site, even if it is mostly graffiti. They should have named it "neoconbiblehumpedia".

I can't remember reading political bios on Wikipedia, so I can't comment. I think the "liberal" bias that they were complaining about on the scientific articles was actually a "pro-evolution" or "anti-religion" bias. Unfortunately, these are considered political issues and thus different viewpoints are labelled "liberal" or "conservative" when they're actually "scientific" and "non-scientific". Accuracy, people!